We obtained a Final Judgment for $334,676.95 after a non-jury trial on claims for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement in favor of our clients, a father and son business involved in developing power systems for satellite tracking systems.
Our client was a permanent makeup artist who discovered the distributor of a micro needling device using her before-and-after photographs in their marketing materials. We brought various claims under the Lanham Act Digital Millenium Copyright Act, and, after extensive discovery, negotiated a $500,000 settlement for our client.
We defended an affiliate network in a class action case with more than $7 million at issue. After engaging in significant discovery and demonstrating that the plaintiffs could not certify a class against our client, we settled the case for a nominal amount.
We successfully defended two commercial lease guarantors against Landry’s claims seeking $2,000,000. We defeated all of Landry’s claims at the trial and appellate level in three separate cases culminating in our client’s entitlement to recover their attorneys’ fees costs in each case.
We represented an energy company in an action against its former CEO and Chief Technology Officer for breach of fiduciary duty and related claims. We obtained a temporary injunction prohibiting the former officer from marketing the company’s technology overseas.
We represented boxer Sugar Shane Mosely in a case brought by Don King Productions to stop a pay-per-view boxing match. After defeating an emergency motion for preliminary injunction, we obtained a dismissal of the entire case against our client.
We represented the health club company You Fit and obtained a preliminary injunction against the defendants prohibiting them from operating a health club named “Fit U.”
In this misappropriation of trade secrets case, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We prevailed at the trial court level, and the defendants appealed the order to the Fifth District Court of Appeal. We advanced arguments that the defendants committed a tort in Florida when they traveled to Florida with the intent to misappropriate our client’s trade secrets under the guise of a potential transaction, then used the trade secrets in their marketing materials at trade shows in Florida. The Fifth DCA affirmed, and we continue to litigate the matter in the venue of our client’s choice.